Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 8000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-400 was launched 3 years prior to the 8000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-400 grades vs the 8000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 8000

 E-400 8000 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-400

 8000 E-400 
LaunchedJuly 2009September 2006Newer by 34 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 8000

 E-400 8000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-400 against the 8000.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and 8000 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and 8000.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus 8000 will give more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Olympus 8000 Portrait photography details
46
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography information
Olympus 8000 Street photography information
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 8000 as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography details
Olympus 8000 Travel photography details
49
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
61
environment proof
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 8000 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
35
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual mode not available
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Olympus 8000 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
28
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus 8000
 Olympus E-400Olympus Stylus Tough 8000
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000
Also Known as - mju Tough 8000
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2009-07-01
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range - 2cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 182 gr (0.40 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $599 $380