Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-400 was brought out 4 years before the 8010 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-400 matches up versus the 8010 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 8010
E-400 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-400
8010 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 41 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 8010
E-400 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 vs the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/471dc/471dc9ac5aafcbb4e45707adb08ae6d2ab4f9c7c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and 8010 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cc4f/5cc4fe33ff9db2d0e7c4d4bedf2b6a646d3bfab7" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and 8010.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus 8010 will render greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91959/919595d1fe140148ea78a9f83949e8128adb63c3" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d1cc/6d1ccbf0cf933a283138dd0eb029930bbe355344" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $600 |