Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-400 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the TG-870 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-400 matches up against the TG-870 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-870
E-400 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-400
TG-870 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 113 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-870
E-400 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 and the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fde15/fde15a41ff4e3bbbe66bae14d48d694d46028c7b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TG-870 is 77 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cd18/8cd18d9a5cdfa3dbfbb7641e97c8fd865788fa40" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and TG-870.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will render extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53cd0/53cd07f9b5844d27b4ca594fec60e6ba6b6196ca" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a91a/1a91a5ab0866e4d19156c81f8aaf91db2841db0b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $599 | $280 |