Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-610, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-400 was released 5 years prior to the TG-610 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 scores vs the TG-610 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-610. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-610
E-400 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-400
TG-610 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 52 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-610
E-400 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus TG-610 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 and the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0a6e/d0a6e945d5dc0c3ad3d36a34437876994fd5cb22" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TG-610 is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f26e4/f26e42e816563ca476d07ef85f6048e49c9b57f9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and TG-610.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-610 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c698/1c69882fafd34d8a5ad7154fb761a978d2fe9fd0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cf61/5cf6147f5848f47756fe6ea66e419e46e3867a46" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-610 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $223 |