Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-400 was unveiled 6 years before the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-400 scores vs the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-400 TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-400

 TG-820 iHS E-400 
LaunchedFebruary 2012September 2006Newer by 65 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1030k215kClearer screen (+815k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-400 TG-820 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 and the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and TG-820 iHS is 77 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The picture below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and TG-820 iHS.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will provide more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography features
46
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
27
offers face detection autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography highlights
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography advice
49
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
59
weather proofing
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
not so great battery power (220 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography advice
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
no Time Lapse mode
38
fairly wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
33
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus E-400Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Category Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2012-02-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 206 gr (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $500