Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus TG-830 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-400 was launched 7 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores against the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-400 TG-830 iHS 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-400

 TG-830 iHS E-400 
IntroducedJanuary 2013September 2006Fresher by 76 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-400 TG-830 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 compared to the TG-830 iHS.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and TG-830 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and TG-830 iHS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will show greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
46
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
low resolution (10MP)
35
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Street photography info
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-830 iHS Sports photography advice
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
48
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Travel photography camera
49
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
67
environment proof
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
45
fairly wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
33
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
 Olympus E-400Olympus TG-830 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus TG-830 iHS
Category Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2006-09-14 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lbs) 214 grams (0.47 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $0