Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was launched 7 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores against the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-400 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-400
TG-830 iHS | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-400 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and TG-830 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will show greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $0 |