Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was announced 7 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-400 scores against the TG-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-400 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-400
| TG-2 iHS | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | September 2006 | Newer by 82 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 215k | Crisper screen (+395k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-400 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-400 compared to the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TG-2 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $380 |