Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Old Model is Olympus TG-4
- Successor is Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-5, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was introduced 11 years prior to the TG-5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 scores vs the TG-5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-5
E-400 | TG-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-400
TG-5 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 129 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-5
E-400 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1421/d1421a3e8d4d2b8958d2948119dc26abf6117872" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and TG-5 is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa3a/7aa3a2eaac90430b1c56d8b4ffdf5e8d345c4cfd" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and TG-5.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-5 will offer more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41172/411729498d1990e3f691a67961fc260c13a59d41" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bf4/c2bf43d637876a984a06d73c30d30635333874b8" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $599 | $449 |