Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus VH-410 front
Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched August 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-410, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-400 was announced 7 years before the VH-410 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-400 matches up against the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VH-410

 E-400 VH-410 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-400

 VH-410 E-400 
LaunchedAugust 2012September 2006More recent by 72 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-410

 E-400 VH-410 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-400 and the VH-410.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and VH-410 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and VH-410.

As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VH-410 will provide greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus VH-410
46
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
35
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Olympus VH-410
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides touch focus
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Sports photography camera
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
68
provides touch focus
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VH-410 Landscape photography advice
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
43
really wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging advice
Olympus VH-410 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
33
really wide (26mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus VH-410
 Olympus E-400Olympus VH-410
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus VH-410
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2012-08-21
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 152 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $599 $186