Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-400 was released 5 years prior to the VR-330 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-400 scores vs the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VR-330
E-400 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-400
VR-330 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 53 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VR-330
E-400 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-400 vs the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f10/b2f10687963a294e4d613d2502c93086c6833dbf" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and VR-330 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4660/b4660507d40eaa60349d9109eb0b0c2826db394b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and VR-330.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d67d/7d67d4e714b3ddfaa3708558803249a24338d6d4" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5002a/5002a6010004fd090cd63b26fbb188b061f657d2" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $599 | $220 |