Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Below is a complete overview of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was released 5 years prior to the VR-330 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-400 scores vs the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-400 VR-330 
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-400

 VR-330 E-400 
RevealedFebruary 2011September 2006More recent by 53 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VR-330

 E-400 VR-330 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-400 vs the VR-330.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and VR-330 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and VR-330.

Clearly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
46
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (10MP)
33
MP count good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography info
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography highlights
49
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than competition (158g)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-330
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
32
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-400Olympus VR-330
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus VR-330
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2006-09-14 2011-02-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $599 $220