Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus VR-340, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was revealed 6 years prior to the VR-340 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 matches up vs the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VR-340

 E-400 VR-340 
Focus manually Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-400

 VR-340 E-400 
RevealedJanuary 2012September 2006Newer by 64 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VR-340

 E-400 VR-340 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-400 against the VR-340.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and VR-340 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and VR-340.

As you can see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-340 will result in more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography factors
45
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
resolution not great (10MP)
34
good megapixels (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography features
Olympus VR-340 Street photography features
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography highlights
49
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
44
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
does not have Timelapse function
43
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
33
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus E-400Olympus VR-340
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus VR-340
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $599 $130