Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FH22, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-400 was launched 4 years before the FH22 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-400 matches up against the FH22 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FH22
E-400 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-400
FH22 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 40 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FH22
E-400 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FH22 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 against the FH22.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81656/8165657c4a7e8036b5e912087ddbdfcde735511f" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FH22 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/036f2/036f2dab3b056a4710c7a6bd7c96279d55e94100" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FH22.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH22 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70094/700947a77bee64368bc2079302bb4857f494901c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0358e/0358e29cd7ab96c3b853cdaed7c0e8381bf10a78" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $200 |