Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
30
Overall
34

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FH22, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-400 was launched 4 years before the FH22 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-400 matches up against the FH22 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FH22

 E-400 FH22 
Manually focus Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-400

 FH22 E-400 
IntroducedJanuary 2010September 2006More modern by 40 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FH22

 E-400 FH22 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FH22 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 against the FH22.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FH22 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FH22.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH22 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FH22 Portrait photography advice
46
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
MP count low (10MP)
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography factors
Panasonic FH22 Street photography factors
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FH22 Sports photography factors
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Travel photography camera
49
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
67
boasts touch focus
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Panasonic FH22
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
42
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Panasonic FH22 Vlogging features
9
can't record video
31
relatively wide (28mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FH22
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
Other name - Lumix DMC-FS33
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-09-14 2010-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 170 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $599 $200