Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a890/9a890f648d04f0d44b0ab60cf66dad92c5bf3b0f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-6.4) lens
- 123g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FH8 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FH8 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-400 was released 6 years before the FH8 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH8 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 grades vs the FH8 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FH8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FH8
E-400 | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH8 over the Olympus E-400
FH8 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 64 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FH8
E-400 | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FH8 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 123 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 and the FH8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9b66/a9b6642b05044edb420a8f42ae69dd8a36b64faf" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FH8 is 77 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb193/eb1935c31b0c32eb042f8791d5c4d8f92ebb7b92" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and FH8.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH8 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bded/1bdeddbb0c477646a23f0bfe0e51274aed1e4b57" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26cf2/26cf21086f37a611e408576f2ad2553ecf03aa7b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FH8 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 123g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $149 |