Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10548/105481727825cb9cec94d025b6a727750d258e12" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FP8, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is very similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FP8 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 3 years before the FP8 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-400 scores against the FP8 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic FP8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FP8
E-400 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Olympus E-400
FP8 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 34 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FP8
E-400 | FP8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FP8 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FP8 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 compared to the FP8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e158/4e158c20ab07bbec6f8bec0e5e193ded5b31498c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FP8 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb5fe/bb5feeb515fcf07e207560abb5b8c97f0f15c696" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FP8.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic FP8 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/649a7/649a7f1900680b06da71804e3bee455a66eb3a62" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2914/b29148095eb5a5724a85637a4f345aac6403b031" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FP8 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $300 |