Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FS25, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 3 years earlier than the FS25 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 grades against the FS25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FS25
E-400 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-400
FS25 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 28 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FS25
E-400 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 versus the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1b49/e1b496b0d2dc1d2c7a2955c5723c058bf982d9a5" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and FS25 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f07f0/f07f0fade01b426ce2fe01aa0fcbf03e1b3710cb" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The image here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FS25.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FS25 will provide more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edbf8/edbf80dc0d6a79d6b171e0a9c29e964127a6bb2d" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29b7d/29b7d0147028e475362cd10f35ad760fd151e780" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $599 | $230 |