Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Introduced April 2009
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FS42, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") feature different sensor sizing.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The E-400 was revealed 3 years before the FS42 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the FS42 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FS42

 E-400 FS42 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-400

 FS42 E-400 
IntroducedApril 2009September 2006Newer by 31 months
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FS42

 E-400 FS42 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.5"2.5"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 versus the FS42.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FS42 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The picture here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FS42.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-400 features the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Panasonic FS42
46
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
MP count low (10MP)
19
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FS42 Street photography highlights
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,000)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Panasonic FS42
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
16
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Panasonic FS42 Travel photography information
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse function
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FS42 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
22
wide angle not great (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Class Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Revealed 2006-09-14 2009-04-17
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1000
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-132mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 132 gr (0.29 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $580