Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
95 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FS7 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FS7 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was revealed 3 years earlier than the FS7 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-400 scores vs the FS7 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FS7
E-400 | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus E-400
FS7 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | September 2006 | Newer by 28 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FS7
E-400 | FS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS7 has sizing of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 compared to the FS7.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and FS7 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FS7.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-400 features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2009-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 139g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $160 |