Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
![Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-E-400/Olympus-E-400-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX700/Panasonic-FX700-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX700, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FX700 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The E-400 was released 4 years before the FX700 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-400 matches up vs the FX700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FX700
E-400 | FX700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-400
FX700 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 46 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX700
E-400 | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 features physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has measurements of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 versus the FX700.
![Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX700-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FX700 is 77 and 94 respectively.
![Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and FX700.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX700 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 176g (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $399 |