Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX75, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was unveiled 4 years before the FX75 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-400 scores against the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-400 FX75 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-400

 FX75 E-400 
AnnouncedJune 2010September 2006More modern by 45 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX75

 E-400 FX75 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 against the FX75.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FX75 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The picture underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FX75.

As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Portrait photography camera
46
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Street photography camera
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography advice
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography info
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography info
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
67
provides focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
37
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Otherwise known as - Lumix DMC-FX70
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2010-06-01
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 165 gr (0.36 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $599 $139