Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
34
Overall
34

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Panasonic FX90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FX90 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was introduced 6 years earlier than the FX90 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-400 grades vs the FX90 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FX90

 E-400 FX90 
Manually focus Very precise focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-400

 FX90 E-400 
IntroducedAugust 2011September 2006Newer by 60 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX90

 E-400 FX90 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX90 has measurements of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the FX90.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and FX90 is 77 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and FX90.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX90 will provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX90 Portrait photography highlights
46
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
low MP (10 megapixels)
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography factors
Panasonic FX90 Street photography factors
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Panasonic FX90 Sports photography info
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
max fps low (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
30
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (200 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FX90 Travel photography advice
49
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
60
comes with focus via touch
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery (200 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography info
Panasonic FX90 Landscape photography info
45
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
36
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Panasonic FX90
9
can't record video
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FX90
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2011-08-26
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 149g (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $599 $227