Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Sony A99
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony A99 II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Pentax and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") and A99 II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 GPS was released 4 years prior to the A99 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-3 GPS grades versus the A99 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony Alpha A99 II. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Sony A99 II
WG-3 GPS | A99 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
A99 II | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | July 2013 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Sony A99 II
WG-3 GPS | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS enjoys exterior dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Sony A99 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-3 GPS and the A99 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and A99 II is 90 and 57 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 GPS and A99 II.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-3 GPS due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A99 II will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 26 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged WG-3 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-07-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 238g (0.52 lb) | 849g (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 490 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $350 | $3,198 |