Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 front
Portability
67
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Panasonic FZ150
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
  • 528g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
  • Introduced April 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ150, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FZ150 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ150 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was brought out 6 years earlier than the FZ150 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ150 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-400 grades vs the FZ150 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ150

 E-400 FZ150 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ150 over the Olympus E-400

 FZ150 E-400 
IntroducedApril 2012September 2006Newer by 67 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ150

 E-400 FZ150 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ150 has proportions of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 528 grams (1.16 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ150 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ150.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FZ150 is 77 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and FZ150.

Clearly, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ150 will provide more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ150 Portrait photography highlights
46
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
41
focusing manually
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Panasonic FZ150 Street photography info
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
58
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (528g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography info
Panasonic FZ150 Sports photography info
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
43
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good battery life (410 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FZ150 Travel photography advice
49
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
good battery life (410 CIPA)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (528g)
MP count low (12MP)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ150
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
48
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (410 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ150
9
can't shoot video
62
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (528 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ150 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ150
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-09-14 2012-04-11
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.2
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 9.50 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 528g (1.16 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 40
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.9
DXO Low light score not tested 132
Other
Battery life - 410 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $599 $499