Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Below is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was announced 6 years earlier than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 scores versus the FZ200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-400 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-400

 FZ200 E-400 
LaunchedJuly 2012September 2006More recent by 71 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kSharper display (+245k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-400 FZ200 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ200.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FZ200 is 77 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FZ200.

All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography information
46
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
no manual mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
48
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
features face detection focusing
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography information
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
57
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (588g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography details
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
46
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
great battery pack (540 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography highlights
49
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
55
great battery pack (540 shots)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (588g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
no Timelapse recording
48
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (540 per charge)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
63
pretty wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone jack
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-09-14 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 588 gr (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life - 540 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $599 $499