Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was announced 6 years earlier than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 scores versus the FZ200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-400 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-400
FZ200 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | September 2006 | More recent by 71 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ200
E-400 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FZ200 is 77 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FZ200.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 588 gr (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $599 | $499 |