Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was revealed 11 years prior to the FZ2500 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-400 scores versus the FZ2500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-400 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-400
FZ2500 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | September 2006 | More recent by 121 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Clearer screen (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-400 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 vs the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and FZ2500 is 77 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and FZ2500.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 915 grams (2.02 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $599 | $998 |