Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Succeeded the Panasonic GF7
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GF8, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and GF8 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-400 was released 10 years earlier than the GF8 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GF8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-400 grades vs the GF8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic GF8
E-400 | GF8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Olympus E-400
GF8 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | September 2006 | Fresher by 114 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Clearer screen (+825k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GF8
E-400 | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF8 has sizing of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GF8 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-400 versus the GF8.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and GF8 is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and GF8.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Panasonic GF8 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2016-02-15 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 266 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $549 |