Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
70 Imaging
51 Features
65 Overall
56
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
- Announced March 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GH1
- Replacement is Panasonic GH3
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and GH2 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Photography GlossaryThe E-400 was unveiled 5 years prior to the GH2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GH2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the GH2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic GH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic GH2
E-400 | GH2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH2 over the Olympus E-400
GH2 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2011 | September 2006 | More modern by 55 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GH2
E-400 | GH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic GH2 has sizing of 124mm x 90mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") having a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 against the GH2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and GH2 is 77 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and GH2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic GH2 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2011-03-23 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 15.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 442g (0.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 60 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 655 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $1,000 |