Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 front
Portability
70
Imaging
51
Features
65
Overall
56

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Later Model is Olympus E-410
Panasonic GH2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 160 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
  • Announced March 2011
  • Old Model is Panasonic GH1
  • Replacement is Panasonic GH3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and GH2 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-400 was unveiled 5 years prior to the GH2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GH2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the GH2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic GH2

 E-400 GH2 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GH2 over the Olympus E-400

 GH2 E-400 
AnnouncedMarch 2011September 2006More modern by 55 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GH2

 E-400 GH2 
Focus manually More exact focus

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic GH2 has sizing of 124mm x 90mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") having a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 against the GH2.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and GH2 is 77 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and GH2.

As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic GH2 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Panasonic GH2
45
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
lack of manual exposure
low resolution sensor (10MP)
70
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography features
Panasonic GH2 Street photography features
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
68
screen can move to multiple angles
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic GH2 Sports photography highlights
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
46
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (330 shots)
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Panasonic GH2
49
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
62
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery life (330 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic GH2 as a Landscape photography camera
44
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
does not have liveview
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (330 shots)
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Panasonic GH2 Vlogging features
9
no video
71
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has microphone jack
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic GH2
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Category Entry-Level DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2006-09-14 2011-03-23
Body design Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 160
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.71x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 15.60 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 442g (0.97 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 60
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 655
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $599 $1,000