Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3e8/ba3e852d8fd2ac4c9d856754d60968dffd538032" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Revealed January 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic SZ10, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SZ10 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SZ10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-400 was released 9 years earlier than the SZ10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-400 grades against the SZ10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic SZ10
E-400 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus E-400
SZ10 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 101 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic SZ10
E-400 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ10 has specifications of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic SZ10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 against the SZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956d5/956d5c329990d81c37b667e424f850930f603fe0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and SZ10 is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20384/203846bb5e0baf25369d79ca521eb323817ef7a9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and SZ10.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic SZ10 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c52/a8c52b75a04fa27542ef88e83bffc8b8369b4b94" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/670c1/670c17efddf9b6fca3b96fa20a3b9c1fa6e1af09" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $200 |