Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3 front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
29
Overall
35

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Panasonic SZ3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic SZ3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SZ3 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SZ3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was manufactured 7 years before the SZ3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ3 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-400 grades versus the SZ3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic SZ3

 E-400 SZ3 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ3 over the Olympus E-400

 SZ3 E-400 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013September 2006Newer by 76 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic SZ3

 E-400 SZ3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ3 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic SZ3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 versus the SZ3.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and SZ3 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and SZ3.

Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic SZ3 will resolve more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic SZ3 Portrait photography highlights
46
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
30
MP count good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Panasonic SZ3 Street photography details
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
64
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (126g)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography features
Panasonic SZ3 Sports photography features
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Panasonic SZ3 Travel photography information
49
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
71
lighter than average (126g)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic SZ3 Landscape photography advice
45
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
39
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic SZ3 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
31
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (126 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic SZ3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic SZ3
 Olympus E-400Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-400 Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ3
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.10 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 pounds) 126g (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 250 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $599 $150