Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
 
               
              95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 144g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FT25
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic TS25, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TS25 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TS25 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryThe E-400 was manufactured 7 years prior to the TS25 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic TS25 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the TS25 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic TS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic TS25
| E-400 | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | 
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS25 over the Olympus E-400
| TS25 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 76 months | 
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | 
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic TS25
| E-400 | TS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display | 
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display | 
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 offers external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic TS25 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Panasonic TS25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 compared to the TS25.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and TS25 is 77 and 95 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and TS25.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic TS25 will show greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
 
          Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic TS25 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic | 
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | 
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FT25 | 
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof | 
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-07 | 
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 | 
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 | 
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 23 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 | 
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm | 
| Total lenses | 45 | - | 
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches | 
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - | 
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs | 
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m | 
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 | 
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 | 
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 144 gr (0.32 pounds) | 
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photographs | 
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | 
| Card slots | One | One | 
| Launch cost | $599 | $180 | 



