Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZR1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-400 was brought out 3 years prior to the ZR1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-400 matches up vs the ZR1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZR1
E-400 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-400
ZR1 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 34 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZR1
E-400 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 versus the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67cdf/67cdf6afdc5edbb2030406948cafb30554869093" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and ZR1 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0adf/d0adfa6c36279b18031bde9e270bea8b691ea448" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and ZR1.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZR1 will offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab4bc/ab4bce8778480d78228504a4984f479953cf07ed" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24536/24536cfdf879f86a70a43ace026d2376b53551ea" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $280 |