Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was revealed 8 years prior to the ZS35 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-400 grades vs the ZS35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-400 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-400
ZS35 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | September 2006 | More modern by 89 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS35
E-400 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-400 compared to the ZS35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and ZS35 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and ZS35.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS35 will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $300 |