Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS40
- New Model is Panasonic ZS50
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS45, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was released 9 years earlier than the ZS45 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-400 matches up versus the ZS45 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-400 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-400
ZS45 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | September 2006 | Fresher by 101 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Clearer screen (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS45
E-400 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS45 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS45 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 against the ZS45.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and ZS45 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and ZS45.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS45 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 249g (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $300 |