Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2eaa8/2eaa8d035b73ee44320a189d3ab6e657e21b47f9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS5, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the ZS5 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZS5 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-400 was released 4 years prior to the ZS5 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-400 matches up versus the ZS5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZS5
E-400 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Olympus E-400
ZS5 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 45 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS5
E-400 | ZS5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS5 has dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-400 against the ZS5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81182/81182b69a74a67ff5f785fef096ec585cf028554" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and ZS5 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d156/9d156e2d3e68e36f645899423552a7f3dd45c169" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing specs. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and ZS5.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS5 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7b91/b7b91fb2c2cfa1743cfa62413c831092920bc32f" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88211/8821130ca76bc7c2c72682b49fee5eea93983e4d" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $599 | $300 |