Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f31fa/f31fa382616d07f56a39b037c098c34aa554d874" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 front"
88 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced January 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS50
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS60, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and ZS60 (18MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and ZS60 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-400 was released 10 years earlier than the ZS60 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS60 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-400 scores vs the ZS60 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Panasonic ZS60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Panasonic ZS60
E-400 | ZS60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS60 over the Olympus E-400
ZS60 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 113 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS60
E-400 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS60 has proportions of 112mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 and Panasonic ZS60 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-400 compared to the ZS60.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e970/0e97077863a33bd4263a7b971d7082f7795e8806" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and ZS60 is 77 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32bc9/32bc95dc900a2b72d609bf6494de867d5f580482" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and ZS60.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS60 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f249d/f249d4cfcdbec5505a6029b143c8d1bbc96d0a31" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a12/48a12a58cf48f29c287a0d7751d39974ca19290c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 282 grams (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $248 |