Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Pentax K-S1 front
Portability
69
Imaging
63
Features
70
Overall
65

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Pentax K-S1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 51200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
  • Announced August 2014
  • Successor is Pentax K-S2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax K-S1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and K-S1 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and K-S1 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-400 was released 9 years before the K-S1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-S1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the K-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax K-S1

 E-400 K-S1 

Reasons to pick Pentax K-S1 over the Olympus E-400

 K-S1 E-400 
AnnouncedAugust 2014September 2006Newer by 96 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k215kClearer display (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax K-S1

 E-400 K-S1 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 provides outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax K-S1 has sizing of 121mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 558 grams (1.23 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax K-S1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 versus the K-S1.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and K-S1 is 77 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and K-S1.

As you can see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Pentax K-S1 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax K-S1 as a Portrait photography camera
46
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (10MP)
77
has manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Pentax K-S1
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (558 grams)
very good high ISO (51,200)
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography factors
Pentax K-S1 Sports photography factors
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
69
great max shutter speed (1/6,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
slow fps (5.4 frames/s)
terrible battery pack (410 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography details
Pentax K-S1 Travel photography details
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
60
lighter than competitors in class (558g)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (410 CIPA)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography advice
Pentax K-S1 Landscape photography advice
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
73
has manual focus
change lenses (Pentax KAF2 mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (51,200)
supports RAW formats
terrible battery pack (410 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Pentax K-S1 Vlogging info
9
can't shoot video
33
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (558g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Pentax K-S1
 Olympus E-400Pentax K-S1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-400 Pentax K-S1
Class Entry-Level DSLR Advanced DSLR
Launched 2006-09-14 2014-08-27
Body design Compact SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Prime MII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Pentax KAF2
Total lenses 45 151
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 5.4 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lbs) 558g (1.23 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 1061
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI109
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $599 $339