Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FS12, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 4 years prior to the FS12 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-500 grades versus the FS12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FS12
E-500 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-500
FS12 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 42 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FS12
E-500 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-500 against the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/377c0/377c02d367aeebef4557961503ca3e51f6c339dc" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and FS12 is 70 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a8af/0a8af20981414a481e302d70172255ae45b48940" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The image underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FS12.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FS12 will provide extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e0c3/8e0c357ed81fd7df7ad7099bdd404ab0aef6fdde" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22f6d/22f6d1dd3921d3a0ac695bae02f9a3ded2dbe02c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $600 | $228 |