Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-400 was manufactured 7 years prior to the MX-1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 grades against the MX-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax MX-1
| E-400 | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-400
| MX-1 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 82 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax MX-1
| E-400 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax MX-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the MX-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and MX-1 is 77 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and MX-1.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax MX-1 will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 391 gr (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $599 | $400 |