Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax MX-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was manufactured 7 years prior to the MX-1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 grades against the MX-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Pentax MX-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax MX-1
| E-400 | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-400
| MX-1 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 82 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Crisper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax MX-1
| E-400 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax MX-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the MX-1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and MX-1 is 77 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and MX-1.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax MX-1 will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 391 gr (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $599 | $400 |