Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced March 2011
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax RS1500, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and RS1500 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and RS1500 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-400 was brought out 5 years prior to the RS1500 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax RS1500 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the RS1500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Pentax Optio RS1500. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax RS1500
E-400 | RS1500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus E-400
RS1500 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2011 | September 2006 | More modern by 54 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax RS1500
E-400 | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Pentax RS1500 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax RS1500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 and the RS1500.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and RS1500 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and RS1500.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Pentax RS1500 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2011-03-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 157 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $599 | $150 |