Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-400 was brought out 5 years before the WG-1 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 scores against the WG-1 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-400 | WG-1 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-400
WG-1 GPS | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 59 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-400 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 enjoys exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-400 vs the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ec37/4ec373270f49df18e8cf4e2bdcaff199fef853bc" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WG-1 GPS is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8685/b8685d20a25fbd96544ba299cf601562c38993f6" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WG-1 GPS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will give you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29157/29157e2599d917a304ada306ca16fe6d50649e60" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1d7/5e1d717b0b46112c98e74ac1f2c890214408f6fc" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $350 |