Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax WG-2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-400 scores versus the WG-2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax WG-2
E-400 | WG-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-400
WG-2 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 65 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax WG-2
E-400 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 versus Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 versus the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/259c4/259c4a47c0093fbd078899c0eef5fe573f6366c5" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and WG-2 is 77 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f770/4f770f8c66220349db6206244f4b56a8da41b3e0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and WG-2.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96974/969744a03ddd0695527534c54e054b4f648a1df9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59b57/59b57212405551ad6c82506d2e663ebd523d0039" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $350 |