Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 and Pentax Q-S1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was brought out 9 years prior to the Q-S1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-400 scores versus the Q-S1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-400 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-400
Q-S1 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 96 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax Q-S1
E-400 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 vs the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97cb0/97cb05930e54bf15f7260561084d87c7446ef3f0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and Q-S1 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6471/e6471c0f1abcd477868a3a12e1da1cf8dac5f80e" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and Q-S1.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax Q-S1 will show more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53857/538578d8f2677a3bc1096cac070513c46497b166" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e1d3/0e1d3371976e048c609188301fc6bf962d9a977a" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 203 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $250 |