Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Pentax WG-3 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-400 was released 7 years prior to the WG-3 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 matches up versus the WG-3 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-400 WG-3 GPS 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-400

 WG-3 GPS E-400 
AnnouncedJuly 2013September 2006More recent by 83 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax WG-3 GPS

 E-400 WG-3 GPS 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 compared to the WG-3 GPS.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WG-3 GPS is 77 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WG-3 GPS.

As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography factors
45
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10MP)
41
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
has face detection focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors (238 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography features
Pentax WG-3 GPS Sports photography features
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Pentax WG-3 GPS as a Travel photography camera
49
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
weather sealing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 shots)
heavier than competitors (238 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography details
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography details
44
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low battery life (240 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging info
9
can't shoot video
34
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competitors (238 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
 Olympus E-400Pentax WG-3 GPS
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-400 Pentax WG-3 GPS
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2013-07-19
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 238 gr (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $599 $350