Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was released 7 years prior to the WG-3 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 matches up versus the WG-3 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
E-400 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-400
WG-3 GPS | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | September 2006 | More recent by 83 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
E-400 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 compared to the WG-3 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WG-3 GPS is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WG-3 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will give you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 238 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $350 |