Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and G900 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was manufactured 12 years before the G900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-400 matches up against the G900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh G900
| E-400 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus E-400
| G900 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | September 2006 | More modern by 139 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900
| E-400 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 and the G900.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and G900 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and G900.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh G900 will offer you more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $752 |