Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Ricoh G900 front
Portability
89
Imaging
46
Features
46
Overall
46

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and G900 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was manufactured 12 years before the G900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-400 matches up against the G900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh G900

 E-400 G900 

Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus E-400

 G900 E-400 
IntroducedFebruary 2018September 2006More modern by 139 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k215kCrisper display (+825k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900

 E-400 G900 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 and the G900.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and G900 is 77 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and G900.

As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh G900 will offer you more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography features
45
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
manual mode not available
sensor resolution low (10MP)
44
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Ricoh G900 Street photography info
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
59
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Ricoh G900 Sports photography advice
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
54
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (340 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh G900 Travel photography highlights
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
69
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh G900 Landscape photography advice
44
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no liveview feature
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
56
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (340 per charge)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh G900 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (247 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh G900
 Olympus E-400Ricoh G900
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-400 Ricoh G900
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2006-09-14 2018-02-21
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash on, flash off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840x2160
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Supports FlashAir SD cards
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 247 gr (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 340 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $752