Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was introduced 5 years before the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-400 matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| E-400 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-400
| GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 | September 2006 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| E-400 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 77 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will render more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | GR Engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $599 | $566 |