Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") boast different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-400 was unveiled 4 years before the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-400 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| E-400 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-400
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2010 | September 2006 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| E-400 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-400 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 77 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor sizes. The E-400 features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-03-18 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $599 | $349 |