Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-20, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-20 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-400 was revealed 8 years prior to the WG-20 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 matches up versus the WG-20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh WG-20
| E-400 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus E-400
| WG-20 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 90 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-20
| E-400 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 and the WG-20.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and WG-20 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WG-20.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-20 will show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2006-09-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 164 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $370 |