Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Ricoh WG-20 front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Ricoh WG-20
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-20, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-20 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-400 was revealed 8 years prior to the WG-20 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-400 matches up versus the WG-20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh WG-20

 E-400 WG-20 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus E-400

 WG-20 E-400 
IntroducedFebruary 2014September 2006Newer by 90 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-20

 E-400 WG-20 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-400 and the WG-20.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and WG-20 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and WG-20.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-20 will show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-20 Portrait photography highlights
45
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
39
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
44
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
71
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-20 Landscape photography factors
44
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
47
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detect focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-20
 Olympus E-400Ricoh WG-20
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-400 Ricoh WG-20
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 164 grams (0.36 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $599 $370