Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-70 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-400 was revealed 14 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-400 grades vs the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh WG-70

 E-400 WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus E-400

 WG-70 E-400 
ReleasedFebruary 2020September 2006More recent by 163 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-70

 E-400 WG-70 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 versus the WG-70.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WG-70 is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and WG-70.

Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-70
45
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
no manual control
MP count low (10MP)
42
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual mode
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography factors
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Sports photography camera
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
49
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
environment proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography information
44
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
no liveview
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
48
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus E-400Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-400 Ricoh WG-70
Category Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2020-02-04
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 193 grams (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Price at release $599 $280