Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WG-70 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-400 was revealed 14 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-400 grades vs the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Ricoh WG-70
| E-400 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus E-400
| WG-70 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | September 2006 | More recent by 163 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Ricoh WG-70
| E-400 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 versus the WG-70.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WG-70 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and WG-70.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2006-09-14 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $599 | $280 |