Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- New Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung DV150F, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and DV150F (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-400 was launched 7 years prior to the DV150F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-400 matches up vs the DV150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 and Samsung DV150F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung DV150F
| E-400 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus E-400
| DV150F | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 76 months | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung DV150F
| E-400 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 offers outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung DV150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 vs the DV150F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and DV150F is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and DV150F.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung DV150F will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Samsung DV150F |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $599 | $150 |