Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is very close but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 7 years before the EX2F which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-400 grades vs the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 and Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung EX2F
E-400 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 215k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+215k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-400
EX2F | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 76 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung EX2F
E-400 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has measurements of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38470/384707d5cf3a3a976d2268817fb11df46b50ac47" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and EX2F is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc72e/fc72edac941dd5f0e7d6164c05da0cafe88945a3" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and EX2F.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung EX2F will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430ba/430ba8d8632ca082e1f425ec962cd13ab86c1fd4" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5404c/5404c72bec6212137e35b3d07c1de4de478b8554" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Samsung EX2F |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $599 | $478 |