Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung HZ10W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-400 was unveiled 3 years prior to the HZ10W which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-400 grades against the HZ10W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung HZ10W
| E-400 | HZ10W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-400
| HZ10W | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 | September 2006 | Newer by 32 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung HZ10W
| E-400 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-400 against the HZ10W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and HZ10W is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and HZ10W.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The E-400 has the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-400 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $599 | $300 |